tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3013360313527223024.post2258793567348260677..comments2010-02-08T00:34:07.953-05:00Ric Crocketthttps://profiles.google.com/106940528089908422328noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3013360313527223024.post-23420393287537846292010-02-08T00:34:07.953-05:002010-02-08T00:34:07.953-05:00I just searched for Saints... and when I went to close that window a new div/status said there were more than 20,000 new tweets with &quot;saints&quot;...<br /><br />If 12% of Superbowl watchers were on net last year, it was easily double that... And, with twitter as a reference, I think that 12% probably was bogus. People were online and it was under reported. So probably half the people watching the superbowl were also somehow online, in my opinion. At minimum.marleyinochttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07194056188013218292noreply@blogger.com